Apple A16 Bionic vs Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9200 Plus
The world of smartphone chipsets is fiercely competitive, with leading manufacturers pushing the limits of performance, efficiency, and innovation. Among the most talked-about processors are Apple A16 Bionic, MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus, and Samsung Exynos 2200. Each chipset represents a unique approach to mobile computing, tailored to deliver top-notch gaming experiences, AI capabilities, and energy efficiency. In this article, we will dive into their architectural differences, benchmark scores, and real-world performance to help you understand which chipset leads in the ever-evolving race for mobile supremacy. So. letโs get started!
Apple A16 Bionic
The highly anticipated A16 Bionic is the flagship processor powering the iPhone 14 Pro series. The chipset is known for its superior single-core performance. It is built on a cutting-edge 4nm process and features a 6-core CPU (2 performance and 4 efficiency cores) and a 5-core GPU. The A16 accentuates optimized performance and seamless integration with iOS, providing industry-leading power efficiency and unprecedented performance in everyday tasks and intensive workloads like gaming and video editing.
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
MediaTekโs Dimensity 9200 Plus is an improved version of the Dimensity 9200. It is designed for premium Android smartphones fabricated on TSMCโs advanced 4nm process. Moreover, the chipset boasts a 1+3+4 CPU configuration with a Cortex-X3 prime core, three Cortex-A715 cores, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. It boasts a powerful Mali-G715 Immortalis GPU, perfect for gaming and AI-intensive tasks. The MediaTek chipset offers robust performance and enhanced thermal efficiency for Android users.
Samsung Exynos 2200
The Exynos 2200 is Samsungโs premium chipset built on a 4nm EUV process. It boasts a unique AMD RDNA 2-based Xclipse GPU, providing console-level gaming graphics. The CPU integrates Cortex-X2, Cortex-A710, and Cortex-A510 cores in a tri-cluster design. Despite initial performance concerns, the Exynos 2200 shines in graphics capabilities, setting a precedent for GPU advancements in mobile chipsets.
The comparison of these three chipsets will help us understand each chipsetโs strengths and weaknesses. Moreover, it will also provide insights into how manufacturers address challenges like power efficiency, thermal management, and user experience. For tech enthusiasts and buyers, such evaluations are important in determining which platform aligns with their performance needs and ecosystem preferences.
Specifications Overview
Chipset | Apple A16 Bionic | Dimensity 9200 Plus | Exynos 2200 |
Manufacturing Process | TSMC 4nm | TSMC 4nm | Samsung 4nm |
CPU Architecture | 2x 3.46 GHz โ Everest 4x 2.02 GHz โ Sawtooth |
1x 3.35 GHz โ Cortex-X3 3x 3 GHz โ Cortex-A715 4x 2 GHz โ Cortex-A510 |
1x 2.8 GHz โ Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz โ Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz โ Cortex-A510 |
Cores | 6 | 8 | 8 |
GPU Name | Apple A16 GPU | Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
GPU Architecture | Apple Bionic GPU | Valhall 4th gen | Voyager (RDNA 2) |
NPU | Apple Neural Engine | MediaTek APU 690 | Dual-Core |
Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Storage Type | NVMe | UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
5G Support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Performance Benchmarks
- The Apple A16 Bionic delivered outstanding performance across various benchmarks. In GeekBench 6, it achieved a remarkable single-core score of 2,627 and a multi-core score of 6,838, highlighting its unmatched raw CPU performance. The detailed metrics underscore its capability for computationally intensive tasks. If we talk about the 3DMark Wild Life Performance test, the chipset achieved a score of 9,874 with a stable 59 FPS and a stability rate of 79%. The impressive GPU power demonstrates consistent graphics performance in demanding scenarios. On AnTuTu 10, the A16 scored a staggering 1,445,704 score, making it one of the most powerful chipsets for seamless multitasking, gaming, and AI-driven tasks.
- The MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus is an all-rounder in performance, especially in GPU-intensive tasks. In AnTuTu 10, it achieved a total score of 1,500,716, accentuating its robust performance across various workloads. In GeekBench 6, it scored 2,090 in single-core and 5,532 in multi-core, highlighting its strong CPU capabilities In 3DMark Wild Life Performance test, the chipset attained a score of 11,021. It maintained a smooth 65 FPS, showcasing its strength in graphics and gaming performance. This makes the Dimensity 9200 Plus a perfect choice for premium Android devices focused on gaming, multimedia, and AI-driven tasks.
- The Samsung Exynos 2200, delivers moderate performance across benchmarks, with noteworthy strengths in graphics rendering. In AnTuTu 10, the chipset scored 1,130,598, indicating a balanced yet trailing performance. In GeekBench 6, it achieved a single-core score of 1,582 and a multi-core score of 3,669, highlighting its adequate CPU capabilities for everyday tasks. In 3DMark Wild Life Performance, the chipset was able to maintain a stable 49 FPS. However, its 61% stability rate underscores challenges in sustained performance. The chipset lags in raw power compared to other flagship chipsets but, its GPU innovations hint at Samsungโs focus on advancing mobile gaming graphics.
Gaming Experience & Frame Rate Stability
- In gaming, the Dimensity 9200 Plus delivers the best frame rate stability, maintaining over 60 FPS in demanding titles with outstanding thermal efficiency.
- A16 Bionic pairs excellent frame rate consistency with iOS-optimized game performance closely following Dimesnity 9200 Plus.
- The Exynos 2200 promises console-level graphics but struggles with thermal throttling. It has less consistent frame rates during prolonged gaming sessions.
Camera & Image Performance
- The A16 Bionic also leads with its advanced computational photography in camera and image processing. It produces highly detailed and color-accurate images while excelling in low-light conditions.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus delivers rich HDR and AI enhancements. It delivers vivid photos but slightly trails in dynamic range as compared to the A16.
- The Exynos 2200 is ISP-capable but often falls behind in speed and post-processing quality, especially in challenging lighting scenarios.
App Launch Times & Multitasking
- A16 Bionic is the fastest in app launch times and multitasking due to its exceptional single-core performance and seamless integration with iOS.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus is competitive in multitasking and Android app optimization but shows slightly slower app launches.
- The Exynos 2200 lags under heavy multitasking resulting in occasional delays due to weaker CPU efficiency.
Battery Efficiency
- A16 Bionic offers exceptional power management ensuring extended battery life during intensive tasks.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus strikes a good balance, providing good battery performance without sacrificing power.
- The Exynos 2200 consumes more energy during GPU-intensive tasks, making it the least efficient of the three.
5G Modem Capabilities
- The Apple A16 Bionic offers download speeds of up to 7.5ย Gbps and support for both mmWave and sub-6 GHz 5G bands. It excels in seamless global 5G compatibility and efficient power management, making it perfect for sustained high-speed connectivity.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus includes MediaTekโs M80 5G modem. It supports mmWave and sub-6 GHz bands with theoretical speeds of up to 7.9 Gbps. Its improved carrier aggregation and dual SIM 5G support make it a good option for global Android devices.
- The Exynos 2200 features Samsungโs 5G modem. It supports both mmWave and sub-6 GHz with speeds up to 7.35ย Gbps. Its real-world efficiency and signal stability are slightly behind Apple and MediaTek solutions in areas with dense network usage.
WiFi & Bluetooth Support
- The A16 Bionic supports WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. It ensures stable connections, low latency, and energy efficiency. It lacks WiFi 7 but its hardware remains potent for current wireless standards.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus leads with WiFi 7 support. It delivers ultra-high speeds and low latency for future-proofing high-demand applications like cloud gaming. Furthermore, it supports Bluetooth 5.3 with LE Audio enhancements for better audio quality and efficiency.
- The Exynos 2200 supports WiFi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2. It provides reliable connections but falls slightly behind in cutting-edge wireless standards compared to MediaTekโs offering.
Satellite Connectivity and Advanced Features
- The A16 Bionic includes emergency satellite connectivity. It allows users to send messages in remote areas without cellular coverage, an innovative feature for safety-focused advancements.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus lacks native satellite communication but compensates with AI-driven connectivity optimization for seamless transitions between 5G and WiFi networks.
- The Exynos 2200 does not offer satellite connectivity. However, Samsungโs ongoing developments in satellite communication may bring future updates to its ecosystem.
Support for Future Technologies
- The A16 Bionic supports the AV1 codec for efficient video streaming. It is compatible with next-gen streaming platforms. Its robust ecosystem and software updates make it highly future-proof.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus also includes AV1 codec support. It offers cutting-edge features like AI-driven network management and superior thermal performance, making it a forward-looking choice for Android devices.
- The Exynos 2200 does not natively support the AV1 codec. It will impact its longevity in the evolving multimedia landscape.
Software & Update Longevity
- A16 Bionic stands out due to the silicon giantโs consistent software updates. Apple has long supported its devices for more than five years, offering long-term software improvements, security patches, and optimizations. Moreover, the A16 Bionic is fully integrated with iOS, ensuring that even older devices continue to perform well with each update.
- On the Android side, both the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus and Exynos 2200 generally receive 2โ3 years of OS updates and security patches. MediaTekโs updates are more limited as compared to Samsungโs. However, neither can match Appleโs longevity in software support.
Power Consumption During Gaming & Heavy Loads
- A16 Bionic is highly efficient due to its energy-optimized design, offering excellent power management. It maintains a balance between performance and battery efficiency, even under heavy gaming or multi-tasking.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus also performs well. It offers solid power efficiency during gaming, due to its 4nm process and well-optimized power management.
- Exynos 2200 consumes more power during intensive workloads due to its RDNA 2-based GPU and its less efficient CPU architecture. During long gaming sessions, the Exynos 2200 is more prone to higher power draw, which impacts battery life more significantly than the other two.
Thermal Management & Throttling
- Appleโs A16 Bionic again takes the crown in this department as the silicon giantโs tight integration of hardware and software ensures its chipsets perform consistently without significant thermal throttling, even during prolonged gaming sessions.
- The Dimensity 9200 Plus also manages heat well. It maintains performance across extended gaming periods with minimal throttling due to its advanced thermal solutions.
- Exynos 2200 offers excellent graphical performance but faces more thermal challenges. Its AMD RDNA 2 GPU generates considerable heat. Under heavy gaming loads, the Exynos 2200 throttles more significantly, leading to decreased performance in longer sessions.
Pros & Cons
Chipset | Apple A16 Bionic | Dimensity 9200 Plus | Exynos 2200 |
Pros |
|
|
|
Cons |
|
|
|
FAQs
- What is the performance difference between the Apple A16 Bionic and MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus?
The Apple A16 Bionic excels in CPU performance and power efficiency, while the Dimensity 9200 Plus offers superior GPU performance and gaming capabilities. However, the A16 leads in overall computational tasks and AI processing.
- Which chipset has the best thermal management?
The Apple A16 Bionic is the best in thermal management. It offers minimal throttling during prolonged usage. The Dimensity 9200 Plus also manages heat well, but the Exynos 2200 tends to throttle more due to higher power consumption and GPU demands.
- Which chipset is best for mobile gaming?
The MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus is the best for mobile gaming. It offers stable frame rates and minimal throttling. The Exynos 2200 also offers strong GPU performance but struggles with thermal management during extended gaming sessions.
- Does Exynos 2200 match A16 in AI performance?
No, the Exynos 2200 does not match the Apple A16 Bionic in AI performance. The A16 Bionic features a more advanced Neural Engine, optimized for AI tasks such as image recognition, machine learning, and real-time computations.
Conclusion
The Apple A16 Bionic takes the crown in overall performance with superior CPU power, AI capabilities, and power efficiency, making it perfect for iOS devices. The MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus excels in gaming and GPU performance, offering a solid all-around experience with good battery efficiency. The Exynos 2200, while strong in graphics, struggles with thermal management and power efficiency, making it less consistent under heavy loads compared to the other two.
PTA Taxes Portal
Find PTA Taxes on All Phones on a Single Page using the PhoneWorld PTA Taxes Portal
Explore NowFollow us on Google News!