Leaked Group Chat Exposes Trump Administration’s Secret Military Strike Plans
A leaked conversation among senior Trump administration officials has revealed details about an impending U.S. military strike in Yemen. The discussion, conducted in a private group chat on the encrypted messaging app Signal, involved key national security figures, including Vice President JD Vance, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
The leak occurred when Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was inadvertently added to the chat by National Security Adviser Michael Waltz. Goldberg later published an article detailing the discussions, shedding light on how top officials deliberated on military actions in real-time.
Inside the Secret Chat
The group reportedly debated policy details and operational plans before the strikes were carried out. Just minutes after the attack on Houthi targets in Yemen, Waltz praised the team, posting celebratory messages along with a series of emojis. Other officials joined in, acknowledging the mission’s success.
However, the accidental inclusion of an outsider in these discussions raises serious concerns about how the administration handles sensitive military operations. Critics argue that discussing such matters on non-secure channels could violate national security protocols.
Political Fallout
The revelation has sparked outrage in Washington, with calls for investigations into the administration’s handling of classified information. Democratic Senator Mark Warner criticized the White House, stating that such lapses undermine national security. Republican Congressman Don Bacon also condemned the use of unsecured communication, warning that adversaries like Russia and China could be monitoring these channels.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, however, dismissed concerns, saying the administration acknowledged its mistake and would take steps to prevent such incidents in the future. Trump himself claimed he was unaware of the situation until the media report surfaced. Meanwhile, speculation is growing about possible resignations within the administration, with Waltz under particular scrutiny for his role in the mishap.
Beyond the security concerns, the leaked messages also exposed divisions within Trump’s national security team. Vice President JD Vance reportedly questioned the decision to strike, arguing that the Houthis posed a greater threat to European trade than to the U.S. economy. He suggested delaying the operation to better align with Trump’s broader foreign policy messaging.
This internal discord echoes past instances where vice presidents have privately disagreed with military strategies. The exposure of these deliberations adds another layer of controversy to an already politically charged issue.
A History of Mishandled Sensitive Information
This incident adds to a pattern of classified material being mishandled by high-level officials. Trump himself was previously investigated for storing secret documents at his Mar-a-Lago residence, while his 2016 campaign focused heavily on Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.
As criticism mounts, the White House has defended the national security team, emphasizing that the strike itself was successful. However, with growing bipartisan concern and increasing scrutiny, the administration may face further fallout from this unexpected exposure.
Source: BBC
Also read:
Biden Administration Decries Trump’s Re-entry on Facebook, Instagram
