Mark Zuckerberg Faces Court Over Meta’s Monopoly Accusations

In a landmark antitrust trial that could reshape the future of Big Tech, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg took the stand this week to defend the company’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp—two platforms now central to its global dominance. This trial holds historic importance: if Meta loses, it may be forced to unwind deals that helped it become one of the most powerful tech ecosystems in the world. The outcome could trigger massive changes not only for Meta but for the entire global digital landscape.

The Core of the Trial: Power or Progress?

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has built its case on a simple yet powerful accusation: Facebook (now Meta) didn’t just out-innovate its rivals—it bought them before they became a real threat.

To support this claim, the FTC presented internal emails from 2011 and 2012, where Zuckerberg and other executives expressed alarm over Instagram’s rapid mobile growth, calling it “really scary.” In one email, Zuckerberg suggested acquiring Instagram not to improve it but to prevent user disruption—keeping it running until Facebook could build something better. This message alone reveals the true intent behind the billion-dollar acquisition. While the court will need more evidence, the FTC is strategically portraying Meta’s motives as a calculated attempt to eliminate competition and cement Facebook’s social media monopoly—not to enhance the user experience.

This case represents a bipartisan effort to curtail Meta’s monopoly power and restore competition to ensure freedom and innovation in the social media ecosystem.

-Douglas Farrar, FTC Spokesperson

Meta’s defense? That it faces stiff competition from platforms like TikTok, YouTube, iMessage, and Snapchat. “The market is broader than the FTC claims,” a Meta spokesperson said. “This isn’t a monopoly—it’s a thriving, competitive digital space.”

The FTC, however, counters that the market isn’t about time spent scrolling; it’s about how people connect with friends and family. And in that space, the government argues, Meta remains unrivaled.

Why This Case Matters?

This case is not just about Meta. It raises critical questions about the nature of competition in the digital economy. If tech giants can neutralize emerging challengers by simply acquiring them, can real innovation ever survive?

From the outset, Meta has defended its Instagram and WhatsApp acquisitions by claiming they improved user experience, created jobs, and offered free services to billions. Critics argue the real cost has been hidden: reduced consumer choice, increased data exploitation, and the disappearance of privacy-focused alternatives.

We are confident that the evidence at trial will show that the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp have been good for competition and consumers.

-Meta Spokesperson

Reality paints a more nuanced picture. When users became dissatisfied with Twitter (now X), they migrated to newer platforms like Bluesky and Mastodon—despite their limited features and clunky interfaces. But leaving Facebook’s ecosystem is far harder. With Instagram, WhatsApp, and now Threads all operating under similar policies, users have few meaningful alternatives.

Instagram vs. WhatsApp: Growth Trajectories Post-Acquisition (2012–2024)

Sources: Oberlo, Vaizle

Instagram had 50 million users at the time of acquisition in 2012 and reached the 1 billion mark in five years. WhatsApp hit the same milestone in just two years, growing from 409 million in 2014.

Both platforms saw steady growth under Meta’s ownership. However, Instagram’s user base declined to 2 billion in 2024, suggesting either market saturation or shifting user preferences. This dip, alongside TikTok’s rise, strengthens the FTC’s argument that Meta sought to monopolize social media by absorbing emerging threats.

The Cost of Convenience

An often-overlooked factor in mainstream coverage is how consumer convenience enables monopolies.

People didn’t resist Meta’s acquisitions because they got something in return: free, fast, and tightly integrated platforms. Messaging between Instagram and Facebook became seamless, and few questioned what Meta was giving up in return.

But this convenience came at a cost:

• Housing Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp under one umbrella gave Meta unprecedented power to track, profile, and monetize users.
• Meta controlled multiple major platforms, making it harder for users to switches, especially when friends, chats, and memories were locked inside.
• With little competition, Meta saturated its platforms with ads while still claiming to be “free.” According to the FTC, this resulted in a “severely downgraded user experience.”

Meta on Trial: What Happens If Meta Loses?

If Meta loses, it could be forced to divest Instagram and WhatsApp—a rare reversal of mergers that already shaped the tech industry. The ripple effect would extend far beyond Meta, setting a precedent for tech regulation in the U.S. and globally.

It would mark a monumental shift in antitrust enforcement and send a clear message to Big Tech: unchecked growth and anti-competitive behavior have consequences.

Meta’s legal strategy, however, hinges on traditional interpretations of U.S. law, which tends to favor mergers that result in growth and innovation—even if they limit competition in subtle ways.

Conclusion: More Than a Legal Fight—It’s a Tech Reckoning

This trial isn’t just about what happened in 2012 or 2014. It’s about what happens next. At its heart, this is a battle over the future of innovation, privacy, and competition in a digital world dominated by a few platforms that are too big to ignore.

Whether Meta remains intact or is broken up, the court’s ruling will set a powerful precedent—reshaping how tech giants are allowed to grow and how far regulators will go to rein them in. Zuckerberg’s testimony was just the beginning. Former COO Sheryl Sandberg and executives from rival firms are expected to testify in a trial set for the last eight weeks.

ALSO READ: Meta’s Grand Plan Brings WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook Closer Than Ever