OpenAI’s New Social App Could Be a Privacy Time Bomb

In a potential game-changing move, OpenAI is reportedly developing a new X-like social networking platform—setting the stage for an even more intense rivalry between Sam Altman and tech titans Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.

According to sources familiar with the project, the social network is still in its early phases, but internal prototypes already exist. These early builds reportedly include features centered around ChatGPT’s image generation capabilities, with a social feed interface format that echoes elements of both Twitter (now X) and Instagram.

According to The Verge, while OpenAI has not made any official announcements, CEO Sam Altman has been quietly gathering external feedback about the prototype. It remains unclear whether the platform will be launched as a standalone application or integrated directly into ChatGPT, which has recently become the most downloaded app worldwide.

If launched, such a move could significantly expand OpenAI’s ecosystem and offer a direct competitor to Musk’s X and Meta’s social products. More importantly, it would give OpenAI access to the one thing its rivals already leverage at scale: real-time, user-generated data.

The Altman-Musk Rivalry Heats Up

Altman’s increasingly visible rivalry with Elon Musk has taken a personal and public turn over the past year. In February, when Musk made an unsolicited $97.4 billion offer to buy OpenAI, Altman curtly declined—and responded with a jab of his own: “No thank you, but we will buy Twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.”

Since then, Musk has further consolidated power by merging X and his AI startup, xAI into one company. His Grok AI model is now tightly integrated with X, giving it a constant stream of live data and helping users generate viral posts.

Social Networks: The New AI Battlefield

Meta isn’t sitting idly by either. The company is also developing a standalone AI assistant app with its own social feed, and it already trains its Llama models using massive amounts of user data from Facebook, Instagram, and Threads.

In contrast, OpenAI has largely operated without a direct line to live social data. A proprietary social network could fill this gap, allowing the company to refine its models using its own data ecosystem, rather than depending on external APIs or partnerships.

One insider from a competing AI lab described the race to integrate AI with social features as a kind of gold rush: The Grok integration with X has made everyone jealous… especially how people create viral tweets by getting it to say something stupid.

AI + Data Strategy Comparison

The Real Battle: Data Ownership and Privacy

While the move into social media may seem like an expansion into new territory, at its core, it’s also about something more fundamental—data. In the age of generative AI, high-quality, real-time user data is as valuable as gold. OpenAI’s potential social network could streamline the way it collects such data, essentially inviting users to voluntarily feed its models in exchange for engaging features and social connectivity.

This strategy isn’t new. Meta already does it on a massive scale, and Elon Musk’s Grok uses X’s live data to enhance interactions. But it’s also deeply controversial. Both OpenAI and Meta have faced mounting backlash and lawsuits from artists, writers, and developers alleging their copyrighted work was used without consent to train AI models. These concerns have grown louder as AI-generated content becomes more indistinguishable from human work.

A dedicated social platform would not only give OpenAI more data—it would give it cleaner, consent-based data generated directly by users themselves. In other words, this isn’t just about social networking—it’s about building a data pipeline that’s easier to justify, harder to regulate, and immensely valuable for training the next generation of AI.

A privacy expert who has advised both U.S. and European regulators shared his views, saying,

This is less about connecting people and more about collecting data. Users need to realize that when they post, share, and interact, they’re not just creating content—they’re creating training material.

The Need for Vigilance

As tech companies expand their AI capabilities, the fight for user data is becoming more aggressive—and more normalized. What used to be scraped or acquired through backdoor deals is now being served voluntarily by users, often without understanding the full implications.

With OpenAI joining the race, it’s a stark reminder that users must become more vigilant about digital privacy. Opting into new platforms may come with unseen trade-offs, particularly when those platforms are powered by AI that thrives on learning from everything users do, say, or create.

In this new AI era, every tweet, image, or comment isn’t just communication; it’s potential input for a system that never forgets.

Final Thoughts

If OpenAI does move forward with its social network, it won’t just be chasing engagement or ad revenue. It will be positioning itself as a powerhouse not just in AI capability but also in data ownership and influence. And as AI and social media increasingly merge, the battle is no longer just about who builds the smartest model; it’s about who gets the most data to feed it.

ALSO READ: OpenAI Delays GPT-5 Launch Due to Massive Demand for Image Generation