Lower Taxes, More Revenue: Telecom Operators Make Their Case to Senate Finance Committee

It is one of the oldest arguments in tax policy: lower the rate, broaden the base, and the government ends up collecting more. Pakistan’s telecom industry is now making exactly that case to the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue, and the committee, while not dismissing it, is not accepting it on faith either.

What the Telecom Operators Proposed

The Telecom Operators’ Association appeared before the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue, which met under the chairmanship of Senator Saleem Mandviwalla. The Association came with a focused set of proposals aimed at reducing the tax burden on an industry it says is being squeezed on multiple fronts simultaneously.

The headline ask is a reduction in advance income tax on mobile usage, from the current 15 percent down to 8 percent. The operators’ argument is straightforward: lower taxes make mobile services more affordable, affordability drives penetration, higher penetration means more subscribers generating more taxable activity, and the net result is higher government revenue than the current high-tax, low-penetration model produces.

The second proposal concerns the Withholding Tax rate. The Association proposed reducing WHT from 6 percent to 4 percent, a reversal of a recent increase that operators say has materially damaged their cash flow positions. The increase from 4 percent to 6 percent, in the industry’s account significantly raised the cash flow burden on operators at a time when they are already managing the costs of network maintenance, diesel shortages, load shedding, and infrastructure investment.

The third proposal targets turnover tax carry-forward rules. Currently, operators can carry forward turnover tax credits for two years. The Association has proposed extending this to five years, a change it argues is essential for loss-making companies in a sector where Pakistan’s low average revenue per user makes the payback period on infrastructure investment unusually long. Limiting the credit window to two years, operators say, effectively penalises companies for investing in networks whose returns materialise over a longer horizon than the current rules accommodate.

The Revenue Logic Under Scrutiny

The committee’s response was pointed. Both the panel and the Finance Minister, who was present and aligned with the committee’s position, stopped short of endorsing the proposals and instead demanded that the Telecom Operators’ Association submit its revenue argument in writing.

The request is a standard legislative mechanism, but it carries a specific implication here: the committee is not yet persuaded that cutting advance tax from 15 to 8 percent would result in net higher revenue for the government. It wants the operators to put their numbers on the table, the assumptions, the modelling, and the evidence, before any formal recommendation is made.

The argument that lower telecom taxes expand the base enough to offset the rate reduction is credible in principle; it has worked in comparable markets, but it requires evidence specific to Pakistan’s conditions, including current penetration levels, price elasticity of demand for mobile services, and the realistic timeline over which higher penetration would translate into higher tax collection.

The Underlying Problem Is Real

Whatever the committee ultimately decides, the operators’ underlying complaints are grounded in documented industry conditions.

Pakistan’s telecom sector already operates in one of the most heavily taxed environments for mobile services in the region. Users pay advance tax at the point of purchase for mobile credit, a tax that is regressive in nature, hitting lower-income users who rely on prepaid services disproportionately harder than postpaid subscribers. The high tax rate is one of several factors, alongside load shedding and infrastructure costs, that have kept Pakistan’s mobile penetration below the levels its population size and urban density would otherwise support.

The average revenue per user in Pakistan is among the lowest in Asia, a structural constraint that makes the industry’s investment economics genuinely challenging. When operators are generating low per-user revenue and facing high tax rates simultaneously, the case for infrastructure investment weakens. That weakening feeds back into slower network expansion, poorer service quality, and ultimately lower mobile penetration, the exact outcome that reduces the government’s long-term tax base from the sector.

The WHT increase from 4 to 6 percent compounds this. Withholding tax is collected upfront, before operators have realised the revenue that the tax is ostensibly levied on. For companies already managing tight cash positions, many of them dealing with the added operational cost of diesel-powered backup generators running around the clock due to load shedding, a higher WHT rate directly reduces the working capital available for day-to-day operations and investment.

What Comes Next

The committee’s request for written submissions shifts the next move to the Telecom Operators’ Association. If the operators can produce a credible, data-backed case that the proposed tax reductions would result in net higher government revenue, accounting for the transition period, the penetration elasticity assumptions, and the timeline, they will have a stronger basis for the committee to act on.

If the numbers do not hold up under scrutiny, the committee has the cover it needs to decline the proposals without being seen as dismissing the industry’s concerns outright.

The outcome will have direct implications for Pakistan’s approximately 207 million mobile subscribers, many of whom are already paying advance tax on every top-up, in a market where mobile services are simultaneously being asked to become the backbone of a Digital Pakistan vision and remain affordable enough for the population to actually use them.

The Bottom Line

Pakistan cannot tax its way to digital inclusion. The telecom industry’s proposals deserve a fair hearing, and the committee is right to ask for the evidence in writing rather than accepting the revenue argument on assertion alone. But the broader context is difficult to ignore: Pakistan’s mobile users are among the most heavily taxed in the region, the sector is under genuine financial pressure, and the government’s own Digital Pakistan ambitions depend on a telecom industry that is healthy enough to invest in the infrastructure those ambitions require. The written submission will either make that case in numbers or leave the industry’s argument where it currently sits, compelling in outline but unproven in detail.

ALSO READ: Senate Committee Approves 5% Withholding Tax on Social Media Earnings Above Rs 600,000