PTA Clarifies Stance on Internet Monitoring: DPI Services Ceased in 2023

In Pakistan, telecom operators procured deep packet inspection (DPI) services as a tool to block unauthorized content on the internet. The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) recently announced that internet monitoring services were officially discontinued in mid-2023, addressing concerns about their purpose and usage.

The PTA issued a statement in response to recent media coverage on the use of DPI technology in Pakistan. DPI technology, which allows for the monitoring, analysis, and filtering of internet traffic, has raised questions globally about privacy, surveillance, and the potential for misuse. The PTA emphasized its commitment to responsible technology usage, specifically stating that it discourages “misuse of technology contrary to human rights by ensuring the legitimate use of the technology within the applicable legal framework.”

PTA Clarifies Stance on Internet Monitoring: DPI Services Ceased in 2023

The recent reports also highlighted the involvement of a Canada-based company, Sandvine, known for developing technology that monitors and manages internet traffic. Sandvine was previously listed under U.S. sanctions due to concerns that its products could be used for “mass web-monitoring and censorship” with implications for human rights abuses, including targeting activists and dissidents. However, the U.S. recently removed Sandvine from its ban list, reigniting discussion about the use of its technology in various countries.

The controversy surrounding Sandvine in Pakistan dates back to 2019. During that year, a Pakistani government minister disclosed to the National Assembly that the PTA had approached Sandvine and another firm to supply equipment intended for “monitoring grey traffic”—the unauthorized or illegal routing of voice calls, often to avoid paying applicable taxes and fees. The PTA clarified that its use of DPI technology focused on limiting grey traffic and other types of illegal or harmful content, such as pornographic or blasphemous websites, within the boundaries of the country’s regulatory framework.

The PTA’s recent statement also sought to clarify misconceptions about the purpose and application of DPI technology in Pakistan. The PTA stated that telecom operators legally obtained DPI services through contracts, aligning with the country’s regulatory requirements. The services primarily aimed to control and limit access to unauthorized or harmful online content. The PTA reiterated that, although deep packet inspection technology can be controversial because of its capabilities in detailed internet traffic monitoring, it used these services within Pakistan’s legal framework and terminated them as of mid-2023.

See Also: Zong Franchises in Hot Water as PTA Targets Illegal SIM Providers

This announcement comes amid broader debates on digital surveillance, censorship, and data privacy worldwide. Digital rights activists and organizations often express concern over DPI technology due to its potential to infringe on user privacy and limit free expression online. In Pakistan, there has also been an ongoing conversation about the implications of internet monitoring technologies for individual freedoms and the state’s role in regulating online content.

The PTA’s emphasis on the “legitimate use” of technology highlights its stance against overreach and unlawful surveillance, although balancing content regulation with digital rights remains a complex issue. As internet access expands and digital ecosystems grow, Pakistan, like many other countries, faces challenges in managing online content responsibly without compromising user rights.

This recent clarification by the PTA may provide some reassurance to those concerned about the implications of DPI and similar technologies in Pakistan. However, with increasing digital connectivity, it remains essential for regulatory bodies, telecom companies, and technology providers to maintain transparency and a commitment to ethical practices to address public concerns about privacy and freedom of expression in the digital age.