Meta Faces Pressure to Revoke Ban on ‘Shaheed’ Term

In its advisory opinion, Meta’s Oversight Board, an independent entity funded by Meta, has expressed concerns regarding the company’s policy on the term “shaheed.” This term is used to refer to individuals designated under Meta’s dangerous organizations and individuals policy. The board suggests that Meta’s current policy disproportionately restricts free expression and recommends ending the blanket ban on this term.

This ruling follows years of criticism directed at Meta for its handling of content related to the Middle East. A 2021 study, commissioned by Meta itself, highlighted the adverse human rights impact of its approach on Palestinians and other Arabic-speaking users of its services. This decision follows ongoing criticism of Meta’s content moderation practices, particularly concerning the Middle East. In a 2021 study commissioned by Meta, it was found that their approach adversely affected Palestinians and Arabic-speaking users.

The criticism intensified during the Israel-Hamas conflict in October, with rights groups accusing Meta of censoring content supportive of Palestinians on its platforms. Despite these challenges, the Oversight Board affirmed that the guidelines on moderating the term “shaheed” remained valid even during crises like the Gaza conflict, advocating for a response that respects human rights.

WhatsApp Integrates Meta AI into Search Bar for Enhanced User Experience

Meta Oversight Board found fault with Meta’s rules concerning the term “shaheed.” The board concluded that these rules overlooked the various meanings of the word and led to the removal of content that didn’t necessarily endorse violence. Board co-chair Helle Thorning-Schmidt noted that Meta’s approach, based on the belief that censorship can enhance safety, may marginalize entire populations without achieving the intended safety improvements.

According to the board, Meta’s interpretation of all uses of “shaheed” as a violation in its designated “dangerous” individual category was too broad. The board noted that excessive content removal might not only be ineffective but also counterproductive. While acknowledging that “shaheed” can sometimes be used to glorify individuals involved in violent acts, the board emphasized that the term has diverse meanings. It is commonly used in reporting, academic discussions, human rights debates, and even in more passive contexts.

Are Meta Platforms Safe For Our Children?

Apart from praising those involved in violence, “shaheed” is often used to honor individuals who die while serving their country, supporting a cause, or as victims of socio-political violence or natural disasters.